Daily Economic News | From 0 to 48, What Else Does the Hong Kong '18A' Biotech Companies Listing Rule Bring Apart from Facilitating the Listing of Innovative Enterprises?

Daily Economic News | From 0 to 48, What Else Does the Hong Kong '18A' Biotech Companies Listing Rule Bring Apart from Facilitating the Listing of Innovative Enterprises?

2022/01/29

Frost & Sullivan insights

In April 2018, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange added Chapter 18A 'Biotechnology Companies' to its Main Board listing rules, allowing biotechnology companies that have no revenue or profit to submit listing applications. As a result, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange has become the preferred listing destination for an increasing number of biotechnology companies.

Is the enterprise suitable for going public in Hong Kong? What will the 18A system bring to enterprises? Which tracks have more investment opportunities in the future? On January 24th, the 'Investment Activity Report on the Issuance of 18A Biotech Companies in Hong Kong' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Report'), co-authored by Frost & Sullivan (Frost & Sullivan, hereinafter referred to as 'Frost & Sullivan'), TradeGo, and LeadLeo, was officially released. It provides a reference guide for biotech companies that are already or intend to go public in Hong Kong.

Daily Economic News

The successful development of an innovative drug cannot be separated from the comprehensive support of policies, systems, and capital, and the '18A' system is the best illustration of this statement.

 

In April 2018, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange added Chapter 18A 'Biotechnology Companies' to its Main Board listing rules, allowing biotechnology companies that have no revenue or profit to submit listing applications. As a result, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange has become the preferred listing destination for an increasing number of biotechnology companies.

 

However, it cannot be ignored that the average fundraising amount has pulled back and market liquidity is low, which has raised concerns among companies and investors. Are enterprises suitable for going public in Hong Kong? What will the 18A system bring to enterprises? Which tracks have more investment opportunities in the future?

 

On January 24th, the 'Hong Kong Biotech Companies 18A IPO Investment Guide: A Report Co-written by Frost & Sullivan, TradeGo and LeadLeo' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Report') was officially released. It provides a reference guide for biotech companies that are already or intend to list on the Hong Kong stock market.

 

Financing Achievements: 48 companies have been listed, with capital heavily invested in biopharmaceuticals

Since 2018, a total of 48 companies have gone public through the 18A rule, with 23 companies currently in the delisting (i.e., hearing stage) status.

 

In terms of pre-listing financing, 18A companies have a high frequency of fundraising before listing, with prominent valuation growth. Specifically, among the listed 18A companies, 39 have had between 2 to 6 rounds of fundraising before listing, accounting for as high as 84.78% of the total. Among them, the company with the most fundraising rounds before listing is Qiming Medical (02500.HK), which has undergone 12 financings.

 

Moreover, there were at most 16 companies whose pre-listing valuation increased by 10 to 50 times. The issued valuations of 18A companies all increased to varying degrees compared to their last round of financing. Among them, the highest increase was seen in CanSino Biologics (09966.HK), with the issued valuation increasing by as much as 66.26% compared to the last round.

 

In addition, the time taken for 18A companies to submit their filings to the issuance market is generally shorter than that of other companies. According to the 'Report', among the listed 18A companies (excluding Chinese concept stocks returning from overseas listings), the average filing cycle from the first submission date to the first day of public offering is about 127 days (natural days, the same below). The longest filing cycle is held by Yongtai Biotech (06978.HK), with a duration of 301 days, while the shortest is held by Oukangwei Vision Biotech (01477.HK), with a duration of 61 days.

From the perspective of the own accumulation of listed companies, the average establishment duration is 8 years. The company with the longest establishment duration is China Antibody (03681.HK), which took 18 years to establish; the shortest duration is 3 years, including Yundeng Newray (01952.HK) and Ocumivir Biologics.

 

In terms of post-listing financing, 18A listed companies are particularly favored by investors. Among the 48 listed companies, the raised funds accounted for 9.16% of the total fundraising on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange during the same period. Among them, BeiGene (06160.HK) raised the most funds, amounting to HK$7 billion; the company with the lowest fundraising was Yasheng Medicine (06855.HK), about HK$417 million.

 

However, from the perspective of distribution ratio, the issuance of 18A companies generally fell below the new share issuance inertia of a 25.00% distribution ratio. Among them, the company with the highest distribution ratio was CanSino Biologics (06185.HK), with an issuance proportion of 26.24%, while the company with the lowest distribution ratio was MicroPort Robotics (02252.HK), with an issuance proportion of 3.80%.

 

One of the reasons for this phenomenon lies in the market's acceptance of 18A bonds. In the early stages of the 18A reform, issuers that had undergone several financings might reduce their issuance ratio to ensure a successful issue and balance the interests of various parties.

 

It cannot be ignored that in the new share issuance market of Hong Kong, China, cornerstone investors (large or professional institutional investors, etc.) have played an important role. Among them, there are 119, 63, and 8 cornerstone investors participating in the biopharmaceutical, medical device, and frontier medical technology sectors respectively, accounting for 82.64%, 43.75%, and 5.56% of the total number of cornerstone investors.

 

This means that among the 18 listed A-share companies, the biopharmaceutical sector is currently the main track for cornerstone investors to enter. Against the backdrop of the biotechnology industry, the Report predicts that the biopharmaceutical sector may be a battlefield for capital pursuit over the next three to five years.

Three major tracks: The market value differentiation among enterprises is evident, and the pharmaceutical industry has started to peel off the “-B” tag.

From an industry perspective, 71 biotech companies mainly focus on three tracks: medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and cutting-edge medical technologies. Among them, there are a total of 47 companies in the pharmaceutical track, which is the most numerous, accounting for 66.2% of all 18A companies; the number of companies in the cutting-edge medical technology track is the least, with only 4 companies, all of which are AI diagnostic and treatment device enterprises, accounting for 5.6%.

 

Among the listed biotech companies, there are 35 pharmaceuticals, 12 medical devices, and 1 cutting-edge healthcare technology company.

 

Some analysts believe that this is related to the development stages of various industries. Since the pharmaceutical policy reform in 2015, with the improvement of patients' affordability, the growth of the patient population, and the expansion of medical insurance coverage, the development of China's biopharmaceutical industry has been unprecedentedly rapid, and the variety of sub-industries has become relatively complex.

 

In 2020, the market scale of the domestic pharmaceutical industry was 1.6 trillion yuan. According to the 'Report', with an overall annual compound growth rate of 6.8%, the market scale is expected to expand to 2.3 trillion yuan by 2025.

 

Market value is the most direct reflection of market development expectations. In terms of market value, the total market value of the 35 listed companies in the biopharmaceutical subsector alone amounts to HK$737.43 billion, making it the sector with the largest total market value among the three major tracks. However, the August 28th effect is evident, as the market value of a single company, BeiGene, approaches 29.1% of the total market value of the 35 companies, which is close to the sum of the market values of all 27 18A biopharmaceutical companies ranked after the top 27.

 

However, the pharmaceutical industry still accounts for the largest proportion by weight, with chemical drugs accounting for 49% of the pharmaceutical market in 2020, amounting to 7945 billion yuan. Next is traditional Chinese medicine, which occupies a 30% share of the pharmaceutical market with 4880 billion yuan. But biopharmaceuticals had the fastest average annual compound growth rate from 2016 to 2020, and their market size accounted for 21% of the pharmaceutical market in 2020.

 

The development stage of the medical device sector is relatively mature. The Report predicts that the industry will maintain an average annual compound growth rate of 13.9% from 2020 to 2024E, a decrease of 5.4 percentage points compared to the 19.3% compound growth rate from 2015 to 2020. The compound growth rate of China's medical device market is 19.3%. In the future, the growth of China's medical device market will be mainly driven by factors such as increased domestic product penetration rates, technological progress, increasing penetration rates, and continuous policy support from the state.

This also results in a relatively weaker market value. The total market value of the 12 listed medical device companies is HK$137.05 billion, less than 20% of that of the pharmaceutical industry.

 

The market capitalization differences are also significant. The number of companies with market capitalizations exceeding HK$5 billion, HK$10 billion, and HK$50 billion is 8, 3, and 1 respectively. Among them, MicroPort Robotics has the highest total market capitalization in this sector, accounting for as high as 41.0% of the market value.

 

Looking at sub-industries, these companies mainly focus on areas such as vascular intervention, neurosurgery, non-vascular intervention, diabetes, diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, and molecular diagnosis. Among them, 12 companies are involved in the largest number of vascular intervention projects; the main indications are distributed across heart and vascular diseases.

 

In the frontier medical technology sector, which has the fewest listed companies, the current focus is mainly on the AI diagnostic and treatment equipment industry. Not only did Eagle Eye Technology (02251.HK) achieve a zero breakthrough in listing as an 18A company in 2021, but the market is also in the early stages of sprinting forward.

 

The Report shows that from 2019 to 2020, the market scale of AI diagnostic and treatment equipment in China increased significantly from 124.7 million yuan to 291.8 million yuan, and it is expected to increase to 755.688 billion yuan by 2030. From 2021 to 2025, the annual compound growth rate is expected to be 152%, and from 2026 to 2030, it will be 26%.

From the perspective of earnings-per-share capability, if a listed company has met the market value/earnings ratio test requirements under Rule 8.05(3), its management team has remained unchanged for at least the past three fiscal years, and the ownership and control rights in the most recent audited fiscal year have also remained unchanged, then its stock name may not carry the 'B' symbol.

 

Currently, the four companies that have removed the 'B' symbol are all biopharmaceutical companies, namely BeiGene, Sino Biologics (01801.HK), Junshi Biosciences (01877.SH), and Fosun Pharma (02696.HK).

 

Looking ahead: Fundraising may continue to be reduced, and the listing location varies by company

As of December 31, 2021, there were a total of 23 companies classified as 18A that had submitted their listing applications but not yet been listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

 

According to the segmentation of tracks, compared with the 18 A-share listed companies where biopharmaceuticals and medical devices accounted for an absolute weight, among the 23 companies that have been delisted but not yet listed, biopharmaceuticals still account for more than 50%. The proportion of frontier healthcare and medical services has significantly increased, making the ratio more balanced.

 

In terms of the number of issuers, from 2018 to 2021, there were 5, 9, 14, and 20 listed companies on the 18A board of indexes respectively, showing a gradual increasing trend overall, with more IPOs in the second half of the year; however, in terms of average fundraising amount, it was slightly larger from 2020 to the first half of 2021, and then saw a slight correction in the second half of 2021.

 

The Report anticipates that in 2022, the number of listed companies on the market for 18A stocks will remain at around 20, with an average fundraising amount possibly continuing a downward trend.

 

"The 18A market has gone through three stages of development: exploration phase, frenzy phase, and adjustment phase," Liu Shoujian, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of CCB International, believes. "In the future, on one hand, more global high-quality biotech companies will choose to list on the 18A market, while on the other hand, the IPO enthusiasm and subsequent stock price performance of different companies will continue to diverge." Facing the future of the 18A market, Liu Shoujian said.

"

The Report shows that the issuance of 18A shares is affected by the new share market and the healthcare sector's performance. In the future, the probability of subscription orders being ten thousand times higher than the offering amount will decrease, but it remains a hot sector in the Hong Kong IPO market.

It is worth noting that for pharmaceutical companies that have mastered certain R&D technologies but have raised large amounts of funds and have not yet achieved profitability, listing on the Sci-tech Innovation Board (STAR Market) is another option. However, the similarities and differences between it and the Hong Kong capital market in China are worthy of attention.

 

At the 6th China Pharmaceutical Innovation and Investment Conference, Dai Wen, Chief Analyst for the A+H Healthcare sector at Huatai Securities Research Institute, analyzed investors' preferences. She believes that "investors in the mainland and Hong Kong have some different preferences." Specifically, there are more traditional Chinese medicine companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, but there are more medical device companies in the A-share market.

 

In addition, the choice of listing location is closely related to the company's needs and the background of its investors. For example, pharmaceutical companies that want to conduct global clinical trials may prefer to list on the Hong Kong stock market for dollar financing.

 

Bao Haijie, Managing Director of the Hong Kong Exchange and Co-Head of Market Development, believes that in addition to financing time and price, the difficulty, timing, and approval process for refinancing should also be considered within the company's listing considerations. 'What is important is not only the listing cost but also whether there are ongoing legal risks and litigation risks later on. The costs in this regard mainly include considering the possibility of class-action lawsuits, policy uncertainties, regulatory uncertainties, and whether a legal team needs to be hired for legal support.'

 

Wang Yinxiang, Chairman of Gaoke Science & Technology Group (01167.HK), stated that for biotech companies without revenue, the speed of financing is very important. The A-share market has a large trading volume, and it usually takes 6 months to 1 year to raise funds in the primary market; however, the Hong Kong market in China has a faster financing process, with most financings concluding within a week after listing. However, financing in the Hong Kong market is a test of the company's and its products' international market recognition, and liquidity is relatively lower.

 

It can be seen that companies have different opinions on the choice of listing locations. However, regarding the market development logic, more consensus will surely be reached within the industry.

 

Wang He, co-founder and CEO of Yongtai Biotech (06978.HK), believes that in the first two decades of the 21st century, the pharmaceutical industry has experienced a rapid development from small molecules to large molecules, and then to cell and gene therapy. In the next two decades, using more complex cell and gene therapies to treat refractory diseases has become the main direction for biopharmaceutical development.

 

*This article is reprinted from 'Daily Economic News', with reporter Lin Zichen. The original article was titled 'From 0 to 48 Companies, What Else Does the Hong Kong Stock Market's '18A' Biotech Company Listing Rules Bring?'


联系我们
联系我们
电话

业务咨询热线

(021)54075836

微信
二维码

扫码关注官方微信公众号

返回顶部
返回顶部

联系我们

×
请选择职位类别
请选择
×